There is an age old debate about the nature of humanity. Are we born good and learn evil? Or are we born with tendencies for both? Leaving our experiences to shape us and push us either to good or evil. It is a debate because arguments can and have been made for both sides. So perhaps this post is redundant, but recent events I’ve witnessed have led me to address this again and add a new factor to the argument, and that factor is the human need to justify our actions.
People, for whatever reason, religious or moral, have a crippling need to justify our actions, to convince ourselves that we’re not the ‘bad guy’ in whatever situation we’re in. Yahoo boys tell themselves they’re Robin Hood, bank robbers tell themselves they’re just stealing back what the bank/government stole from the people, or that society left them no choice, murderers tell themselves “it was him or me”, corrupt officials tell themselves “if I don’t take it, someone else will, I’m just paying myself for my work”, when we fight we tell ourselves the other person provoked us, when we cut in line we convince ourselves we’re out of time and more in a hurry than others. I find this course of action especially fascinating because we do this even when there are no consequences or rewards for this justification, no one really cares why you did that one thing that one time, but you’re still telling yourself it was just, explaining your actions to anyone that’ll listen so they can agree with you. We do this to feel better about ourselves, because we want to be good and so when we do something bad, we try to convince others and particularly ourselves, that it was still the right thing to do, that we had no choice or that it was for the greater good.
This is why people shalaye, for those not in the know, shalaye means to explain unnecessary things. It’s something most, if not all of us have done at some point. This justification factor leads me to wonder, if humans consistently try to convince ourselves that we are good and all our actions justified even when it doesn’t matter, does this therefore mean that we are inherently good? Born with a goodness in our hearts that stays with us? A goodness we long to maintain or return to when we do something we think is bad and so we simply tell ourselves it is good.
Or are we simply born with good and evil? Or neither? Do we desire to be good only because society and religion tell us to be? But then again, every human being is naturally capable of great good and great kindness without training, conversely, only a few are capable of great evil and even then, it usually requires a great deal of conditioning to attain such levels. Even security forces who kill others for ‘good’ reason still have trouble with such acts, despite it being generally accepted as just by most people.
What are your thoughts on the subject? Does the justification factor decide the argument? Do you think people are born good? Bad? Or indifferent? Do you remember a time when you “shalayed” to justify your actions? Please like, share and Leave me a comment below. I’ll respond to every one. Thanks for reading.

This is Insightful, I think the justification factor proves that people are naturally good but of Course there are exceptions
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your comment Sam. Yes there are exceptions to every rule, so definitely a few people would be different regardless of how they’re born. You just gave us a good idea for a new post
LikeLike
“The justification factor”. First of all, this is a great read. It got me thinking. Now what I think is that on one hand, people are born with the capacity for both good and evil. I’m Christian and I want to remove religious sentiment. People can be really terrible and if you look at it from the moment a child is born, it knows nothing. Only life’s experiences teach a child to “be” either good or evil. And on the other hand, the heart of man is inherently evil. But it is the decisions we make that make the difference
LikeLike
[…] While surviving an accident might prove to you that God is watching over you, getting into the accident in the first place might be proof to someone else that he isn’t, same event, different result. While this is a cool thing to know, you might wonder if it matters at all, I did too, and it made me ask a different question. If the same event can have varying effects on different people, then does that mean it’s illogical to blame or credit our past experiences for the people we are today. I mean if the same tragic event that made person A want to become a police officer, conversely made person B decide to become a professional criminal, then can we truly say it was the event that shaped their paths in life? or was it all their own doing? Their own choices. There is an argument that people are naturally inclined to either good, evil or neither. This natural affiliation may influence, and thus explain their decisions in the aftermath of such events. I think people may be naturally inclined to good, and you can read how i came to that conclusion here: Inherent Goodness: the justification factor. […]
LikeLike
[…] I often wonder how people end up running scams and how they rationalize their actions, I wrote about how people are naturally good and how I came to that conclusion. If you’d like to know more about our natural inclination to good or evil, then read Inherent Goodness: The Justification Factor […]
LikeLike